fix(sequentialthinking): Fix validation bugs rejecting valid inputs (#3)#3001
Closed
27Bslash6 wants to merge 1 commit intomodelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
Closed
fix(sequentialthinking): Fix validation bugs rejecting valid inputs (#3)#300127Bslash6 wants to merge 1 commit intomodelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
27Bslash6 wants to merge 1 commit intomodelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
Conversation
Fixes #3 Problem: - Falsy checks (!data.thoughtNumber) rejected valid 0 values - No bounds checking for negative numbers, NaN, Infinity - Unsafe type assertions on optional fields without validation - Empty strings passed validation Solution: - Replace falsy checks with explicit typeof and bounds validation - Add Number.isFinite() checks to reject NaN and Infinity - Add explicit >= 1 checks for numeric fields - Validate optional fields only when present (undefined check) - Add length check for string fields Tests: - Added 12 new tests covering edge cases - All 37 tests pass - Coverage: 94.59% statements, 91.8% branches This is the foundation for subsequent fixes - validation must be rock-solid before addressing concurrency and state management.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
Issue #3 identified critical validation bugs in
src/sequentialthinking/lib.ts:!data.thoughtNumberwhich incorrectly rejects0NaN, andInfinitypassed validationas boolean | undefinedwithout runtime validationthoughtallowed empty strings to passSolution
Replaced unsafe falsy checks with explicit validation:
Required Fields
thought: Checktypeof === 'string'ANDlength > 0thoughtNumber&totalThoughts:typeof === 'number'Number.isFinite()(rejects NaN/Infinity)>= 1(rejects negatives and zero)nextThoughtNeeded: Type check only (boolean)Optional Fields
!== undefinedisRevision,needsMoreThoughts: Boolean type checkrevisesThought,branchFromThought: Number type + finite + boundsbranchId: String type + non-empty checkTest Coverage
Added 12 new edge case tests:
All 37 tests pass
Coverage: 94.59% statements, 91.8% branches
Why This First?
This PR establishes the foundation. Validation must be bulletproof before tackling:
Garbage in, garbage out. Fix validation first.
Files Changed
src/sequentialthinking/lib.ts(validateThoughtData method)src/sequentialthinking/__tests__/lib.test.ts(12 new tests)Testing
Closes #3